Lightroom simplifies the Library and Develop modules. Most photographers do not miss the Map, Book, Slideshow, Print, and Web modules. The module organization system in Lightroom Classic is missing from Lightroom. When importing images, the Lightroom version has some missing metadata features.Ĭompare catalog structure for Lightroom Classic (left) and Lightroom (right) This is one of the primary differences.īoth programs have access to the Creative Cloud. You store your photos in the cloud rather than on physical media. In Lightroom, Add Photos replaces Import Photos. The layout of the desktop and the location of the tools is different. Import and Catalogįirst, the programs look different. But some features are different by design. Adobe has added most of these tools in later versions. They share features but are not the same.Īt first, Lightroom did not have as many tools as Lightroom Classic. So let’s compare them.īoth Lightroom and Lightroom Classic are desktop programs. They are available across all versions of the program. You can sync Collections created in Lightroom Classic to the cloud. But Lightroom Classic remains popular, and Adobe continues to support the program. The new program was cloud-based rather than desktop-based.Ĭloud-based software was the future. When Adobe released Lightroom, they appeared to be moving in a new direction. Screenshot of Lightroom Classic Develop module Lightroom vs Lightroom Classic Let’s start by comparing the two desktop versions of Lightroom. The Adobe Creative Cloud Photography Plan includes all the programs we discuss here. To use Lightroom, subscribe to a Lightroom plan with Adobe.
![adobe lightroom vs adobe photoshop lightroom 5 adobe lightroom vs adobe photoshop lightroom 5](https://www.softportal.com/scr/23793/adobe-photoshop-lightroom-big-1.jpg)
These programs all use Adobe Creative Cloud. Since then, Adobe has caused some confusion with new releases and name changes. Background of Lightroom vs Lightroom ClassicĪdobe released Lightroom in 2007.
![adobe lightroom vs adobe photoshop lightroom 5 adobe lightroom vs adobe photoshop lightroom 5](https://i.pcmag.com/imagery/reviews/00IqyCjVvNfGZNaO9XsFAr2-70.png)
![adobe lightroom vs adobe photoshop lightroom 5 adobe lightroom vs adobe photoshop lightroom 5](http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-RRRORx3iJs4/U52lylOXEII/AAAAAAAAAUA/zWGYeoE3ILA/s1600/light.png)
There are different versions of Lightroom, each with its strengths and advantages.
![adobe lightroom vs adobe photoshop lightroom 5 adobe lightroom vs adobe photoshop lightroom 5](https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-mWH7HZedwwc/VA0-0rqHoEI/AAAAAAAACD8/VusET0rNjNo/s1600/Adobe%2BLightroom%2B5.6%2BScreenshot.png)
But Lightroom does not refer to a single application. We also take a look at the mobile app and browser-based versions.Īdobe Lightroom is one of the most popular software choices for post-processing. If, like Pye Jirsa and I, you regularly conduct shoots with anywhere from hundreds to thousands of images each time, you're most likely going to want to stick to Classic.In this article, we will compare Lightroom vs Lightroom Classic. However, if you tend to work in smaller batches, Lightroom offers remote access to your images automatically, as well as backups, and a few other useful tools. That is, if you have huge volumes of work - as I do - Lightroom will likely not be the best option for you. Whereas Lightroom is primarily aimed at being cloud-based. The primary difference is that Lightroom Classic works as it always has with regards to the catalog of your images: it's locally stored. The difference between the two clients is both profound and minimal depending on what you're looking at. And that's actually what I did, but for better reasons. I wanted to "nope" straight out of the new client and go back to the version I could use in my sleep. I generally embrace change, but when it pulls the rug out from under my workflow, things get messier. When I first opened the shiny new Lightroom some years back, I immediately balked at the change.